mirror of
https://github.com/ThearchyHelios/AgentLab.git
synced 2026-11-15 19:32:01 +00:00
ThearchyHelios
4ceac6b74c
- 出处：一条查询都没执行成功的判什么都记为无法判断，判「被推翻」的理由里还得引用到自己的查询结果——零查询的推翻能让 正式出具降档，零查询的「经受住」会给审批人假安心。系统写明原因，反方原本的结论和理由照录。这句引用的数据源都已 停用时不派 agent；核查模型本身用不了时后面的句子照同一个原因记，不再逐句去建模型 - 时间线：有句子没能反查时另记一条 challenge_unreviewed（带第一条原因），challenge_done 的说法分开写查过的和没查成的 - 审批卡：「报告 → 反方审稿 → 人工审批」时审批说明不引用正文也认得出这份报告（reviewed_report_ids 穿过直接连着的 反方审稿，reviewed_by_human 同步），审稿概况附得上 - 重试与接着跑：同一次执行里的重试沿用已经审完的结果，不再多花一份钱、也不会把「被推翻」重审掉；审稿结果带输入指纹 （报告、文档、反方模型、上限、遮罩），接着跑时只改「结论被推翻时」沿用，改了审稿本身就重审 - 处置：产出和审批卡里的 on_refuted 写实际生效的 degrade / flag；「报错并停止运行」配「出错时：记录错误并继续」画布 校验挡住，跳过校验的旧图执行时改按出具降档；反方审稿不在带出具契约的成果节点上游时画布给警告（降档不会发生） - 摘录里指向原报告查询的写法（指标取自查询 Qn、查询 Qn 的 SQL、出现在查询 Qn）都标成「原报告 Qn」，和反查 agent 自己的 Q1 分开 - 选项叫法和检查器下拉一致：出具降档 / 只标注 / 报错并停止运行，「启用」写跟随设置；助手手册同步 - 补测试：快照里的反方模型和每日上限、裁判判成不是结论的句子不审、审批卡只给被审的那份报告挂概况
421 lines
20 KiB
Python
421 lines
20 KiB
Python
from __future__ import annotations
|
||
|
||
import json
|
||
import re
|
||
import time
|
||
from typing import Any
|
||
|
||
from app.core.events import EventType
|
||
from app.db.base import SessionLocal
|
||
from app.engine.approval import read_decision
|
||
from app.engine.context import NodeContext, NodeError
|
||
from app.engine.replay import ask, once
|
||
from app.engine.state import GraphState, merge_usage, message_text, template_context
|
||
from app.providers import catalog
|
||
from app.providers.factory import ModelSpec, get_chat_model
|
||
|
||
|
||
async def run_human(state: GraphState, ctx: NodeContext) -> dict[str, Any]:
|
||
"""人工介入节点。
|
||
|
||
执行到这里会挂起整张图并落盘 checkpoint；进程重启也不影响，
|
||
人在前端回复之后从断点继续，而不是从头重跑。
|
||
"""
|
||
mode = ctx.cfg("mode", "approve") # approve | input | edit
|
||
payload = {
|
||
"kind": "human_node",
|
||
"node_id": ctx.node.id,
|
||
"mode": mode,
|
||
"title": ctx.render_str(ctx.cfg("title", "待审批"), state),
|
||
"message": ctx.render_str(ctx.cfg("message", ""), state),
|
||
"schema": ctx.cfg("schema") or {},
|
||
"context": ctx.render(ctx.cfg("context", {}) or {}, state),
|
||
}
|
||
if mode == "edit":
|
||
payload["draft"] = ctx.render(ctx.cfg("draft", ""), state)
|
||
if reports := _reviewed_reports(state, ctx):
|
||
payload["reports"] = reports
|
||
|
||
response = await ask(ctx, payload, **payload)
|
||
# 谁批的跟着事件走：时间线要写得出"张工驳回了"，没署名就是 None，不再默认写"你"
|
||
await once(ctx, EventType.HUMAN_RESOLVED, response=response, actor=ctx.actor())
|
||
decision = read_decision(response)
|
||
|
||
if mode == "approve":
|
||
approved = decision.approved
|
||
result: dict[str, Any] = {
|
||
"approved": approved,
|
||
"note": decision.note,
|
||
"__decision__": "approved" if approved else "rejected",
|
||
}
|
||
if not approved and ctx.cfg("stop_on_reject", False):
|
||
raise NodeError(ctx.node.id, f"人工驳回：{result['note'] or '未说明原因'}")
|
||
else: # edit / input
|
||
# 驳回在这两种模式下以前是个摆设：__decision__ 硬编码成 approved，
|
||
# approved 字段看都不看。界面上按钮在、toast 说"已驳回"，运行却照常
|
||
# 往下走——比没有这个按钮更糟。
|
||
#
|
||
# 这两种模式在图上只有一个 out 出口（没有 rejected 那条边），所以驳回
|
||
# 的正确语义是终止运行，而不是当作通过继续。缺省仍是通过：只传 value
|
||
# 不带 approved 的老调用方行为不变。
|
||
#
|
||
# 只有结构体里明说了"不"才算驳回：这两种模式下裸字符串就是内容本身，
|
||
# 用户在输入框里回一句"no"是在交稿，不是在驳回。
|
||
if isinstance(response, dict) and decision.rejected:
|
||
raise NodeError(ctx.node.id, f"人工驳回：{decision.note or '未说明原因'}")
|
||
note = decision.note if isinstance(response, dict) else "" # 裸字符串是内容，不是备注
|
||
result = {"value": decision.value, "note": note, "__decision__": "approved"}
|
||
|
||
updates: dict[str, Any] = {"nodes": {ctx.node.id: result}}
|
||
var_name = ctx.cfg("assign_to", "")
|
||
if var_name:
|
||
updates["vars"] = {var_name: result.get("value", result.get("approved"))}
|
||
return updates
|
||
|
||
|
||
#: 模板里对某个节点产出的引用：{{ nodes.write.text }}、{{ vars.weekly }}
|
||
_NODE_REF = re.compile(r"\bnodes\s*\.\s*([\w-]+)")
|
||
_VAR_REF = re.compile(r"\bvars\s*\.\s*([\w-]+)")
|
||
#: 审批卡要的裁判摘要：判了几句、各判成什么、有没有判完。其余（上限、费用、模型名）留在证据面板里看
|
||
_JUDGE_KEYS = ("mode", "counts", "complete", "unjudged", "limits_hit")
|
||
|
||
|
||
def reviewed_report_ids(spec: Any, human: Any) -> list[str]:
|
||
"""一个人工审批节点审的是哪几份报告：上游直接连着的报告撰写节点，直接连着的反方审稿节点审的那份报告，加上
|
||
标题、说明里引用了正文的（{{ nodes.<id>.text }}，或者报告的 assign_to 变量）。只看图，不看运行状态。
|
||
|
||
「报告 → 反方审稿 → 人工审批」是反方审稿推荐的接法：审批节点的直接上游是反方审稿，只认直接连着的报告撰写节点的话，
|
||
审批卡上一份报告都没有，被推翻的结论审批人批准时完全不知道。反方审稿审哪份照 schema.challenge_report 认，和它
|
||
执行时审的是同一份。
|
||
|
||
审批卡（_reviewed_reports）和报告节点（reviewed_by_human：要交给人审的报告，探索运行也在节点里判）
|
||
用的是同一套认法，两边说的「这份报告要人审」不会对不上。"""
|
||
from app.engine.schema import NodeType, challenge_report
|
||
|
||
config = human.config or {}
|
||
text = " ".join(json.dumps(config.get(key), ensure_ascii=False, default=str)
|
||
for key in ("title", "message", "context", "draft") if config.get(key))
|
||
# 报告节点的 assign_to 也能把正文交给下游：{{ vars.<assign_to> }} 和 {{ nodes.<id>.text }} 一样算引用
|
||
by_var = {str(n.config.get("assign_to")): n.id for n in spec.nodes
|
||
if n.type == NodeType.REPORT and n.config.get("assign_to")}
|
||
nodes = spec.node_map()
|
||
|
||
def upstream(source: str) -> str | None:
|
||
node = nodes.get(source)
|
||
return challenge_report(spec, node)[0] if node is not None and node.type == NodeType.CHALLENGE else source
|
||
|
||
wanted = ([upstream(e.source) for e in spec.edges if e.target == human.id] + _NODE_REF.findall(text)
|
||
+ [by_var[v] for v in _VAR_REF.findall(text) if v in by_var])
|
||
return [rid for rid in dict.fromkeys(wanted)
|
||
if rid and (n := nodes.get(rid)) is not None and n.type == NodeType.REPORT]
|
||
|
||
|
||
def reviewed_by_human(spec: Any, report_id: str) -> bool:
|
||
"""这份报告会不会交给人工审批（有审批节点审它，认法同 reviewed_report_ids）。"""
|
||
from app.engine.schema import NodeType
|
||
|
||
return any(report_id in reviewed_report_ids(spec, n) for n in spec.nodes if n.type == NodeType.HUMAN)
|
||
|
||
|
||
def _reviewed_reports(state: GraphState, ctx: NodeContext) -> list[dict[str, Any]]:
|
||
"""这次审批审的报告各自的核对概况（审的是哪几份见 reviewed_report_ids）。
|
||
|
||
真实运行里报告有一句结论和证据相矛盾，审批人批准时完全不知道：审批卡只有正文。这里带上报告节点产出里的
|
||
stats（同 report.checked）、结论句策略、裁判摘要和报告文档的工件 id，审批卡据此写核对概况、给打开证据的入口。
|
||
审这份报告的反方审稿已经审完的，再带上它的概况（challenge：几句被推翻、被削弱，打开审稿记录的入口）；没有就
|
||
不加这个键。只认已经跑完、带着核对统计的报告；重放时 state 一样，算出来的也一样。"""
|
||
from app.engine.nodes.challenge import challenge_summary
|
||
from app.engine.schema import NodeType
|
||
|
||
spec = ctx.run.spec
|
||
nodes = spec.node_map()
|
||
outputs = state.get("nodes") or {}
|
||
out: list[dict[str, Any]] = []
|
||
for rid in reviewed_report_ids(spec, ctx.node):
|
||
node = nodes.get(rid)
|
||
result = outputs.get(rid)
|
||
if node is None or node.type != NodeType.REPORT or not isinstance(result, dict) \
|
||
or not isinstance(result.get("stats"), dict):
|
||
continue
|
||
item: dict[str, Any] = {
|
||
"node_id": rid, "label": node.title,
|
||
"stats": {k: v for k, v in result["stats"].items() if isinstance(v, int) and not isinstance(v, bool)},
|
||
"claims": result.get("claims") or "off",
|
||
}
|
||
if isinstance(result.get("doc_artifact"), str) and result["doc_artifact"]:
|
||
item["doc_artifact"] = result["doc_artifact"]
|
||
if isinstance(result.get("judge"), dict):
|
||
item["judge"] = {k: result["judge"][k] for k in _JUDGE_KEYS if k in result["judge"]}
|
||
if (challenge := challenge_summary(spec, outputs, rid)) is not None:
|
||
item["challenge"] = challenge
|
||
out.append(item)
|
||
return out
|
||
|
||
|
||
# --------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
||
# 结构化校验
|
||
# --------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
||
|
||
|
||
async def run_validate(state: GraphState, ctx: NodeContext) -> dict[str, Any]:
|
||
"""按 JSON Schema 校验上游产出。
|
||
|
||
校验失败时可以把错误原样喂回模型让它改 —— 这比在 prompt 里祈祷它输出正确格式可靠得多。
|
||
但修复只许改格式：修出来的值要能在原文里找到，找不到的就是模型编的（见 _invented）。
|
||
"""
|
||
import jsonschema
|
||
|
||
schema = ctx.cfg("schema")
|
||
if not schema:
|
||
raise NodeError(ctx.node.id, "「结构校验」节点需要填写 JSON Schema")
|
||
|
||
source_cfg = ctx.cfg("source", "{{ last_message }}")
|
||
original = ctx.render(source_cfg, state) if not isinstance(source_cfg, str) else ctx.render_str(source_cfg, state)
|
||
max_retries = int(ctx.cfg("max_retries", 2) or 0)
|
||
repair = bool(ctx.cfg("repair_with_llm", True))
|
||
|
||
attempt = 0
|
||
errors: list[str] = []
|
||
raw: Any = original
|
||
value: Any = raw
|
||
usage: dict[str, Any] = {}
|
||
|
||
while True:
|
||
value, parse_error = _coerce_json(raw)
|
||
invented = [] if parse_error or raw is original else _invented(value, original, schema)
|
||
if parse_error:
|
||
errors = [parse_error]
|
||
elif invented:
|
||
# 修复编出了原文没有的值（真实运行里是凭空的 total_count: 0）。这次修复作废，
|
||
# 下一次仍从原文修，而不是在编出来的那份上接着改
|
||
errors = [f"修复时出现了原文没有的值：{'、'.join(invented[:5])}"]
|
||
ctx.emit(EventType.LOG, level="warn", code="repair_invented",
|
||
message=f"第 {attempt} 次修复作废：{errors[0]}")
|
||
else:
|
||
try:
|
||
jsonschema.validate(value, schema)
|
||
ctx.emit(EventType.LOG, level="info", message=f"校验通过（第 {attempt + 1} 次尝试）")
|
||
result = {"valid": True, "data": value, "attempts": attempt + 1, "errors": []}
|
||
updates: dict[str, Any] = {"nodes": {ctx.node.id: result}}
|
||
if usage:
|
||
updates["usage"] = usage
|
||
var_name = ctx.cfg("assign_to", "")
|
||
if var_name:
|
||
updates["vars"] = {var_name: value}
|
||
return updates
|
||
except jsonschema.ValidationError as e:
|
||
path = "/".join(str(p) for p in e.absolute_path) or "（根）"
|
||
errors = [f"{path}: {e.message}"]
|
||
|
||
if not invented:
|
||
ctx.emit(EventType.LOG, level="warn", message=f"第 {attempt + 1} 次校验失败：{errors[0]}",
|
||
code="validate_retry")
|
||
attempt += 1
|
||
if attempt > max_retries or not repair:
|
||
break
|
||
raw, spent = await _repair(original, schema, errors, ctx)
|
||
usage = merge_usage(usage, spent)
|
||
|
||
result = {"valid": False, "data": value, "attempts": attempt, "errors": errors}
|
||
if ctx.cfg("fail_fast", True):
|
||
raise NodeError(ctx.node.id, f"结构化校验未通过：{'；'.join(errors)}{_upstream_cut_short(state, ctx)}")
|
||
return {"nodes": {ctx.node.id: result}, **({"usage": usage} if usage else {})}
|
||
|
||
|
||
def _upstream_cut_short(state: GraphState, ctx: NodeContext) -> str:
|
||
"""上游有 agent 没等到自己给结论就收了尾（步数、预算、上下文……），缺字段多半出在那里。
|
||
|
||
以前报错只有一句「regions: None is not of type 'array'」，看不出根源是上游
|
||
agent 用满了步数、查到一半就被收了尾（run 719253eb / 6310f291）。
|
||
"""
|
||
from app.engine.guards import LIMITED_LABEL
|
||
|
||
nodes = ctx.run.spec.node_map()
|
||
cut = [
|
||
f"「{nodes[nid].title if nid in nodes else nid}」因{LIMITED_LABEL.get(out['limited'], '达到上限')}"
|
||
for nid, out in (state.get("nodes") or {}).items()
|
||
if isinstance(out, dict) and out.get("limited")
|
||
]
|
||
if not cut:
|
||
return ""
|
||
return (f"。上游{'、'.join(cut)}提前结束，缺失的字段很可能源于此。"
|
||
"请查看其结束提示，调大相应上限或缩小查询范围")
|
||
|
||
|
||
def _coerce_json(raw: Any) -> tuple[Any, str | None]:
|
||
"""尽量把模型输出解析成 JSON：剥掉 ``` 围栏，再退一步找第一个完整对象。"""
|
||
if isinstance(raw, (dict, list)):
|
||
return raw, None
|
||
text = str(raw or "").strip()
|
||
if text.startswith("```"):
|
||
lines = text.splitlines()
|
||
text = "\n".join(lines[1 : -1 if lines[-1].strip().startswith("```") else None]).strip()
|
||
try:
|
||
return json.loads(text), None
|
||
except json.JSONDecodeError:
|
||
pass
|
||
start = min(
|
||
(i for i in (text.find("{"), text.find("[")) if i >= 0), default=-1
|
||
)
|
||
if start >= 0:
|
||
for end in range(len(text), start, -1):
|
||
try:
|
||
return json.loads(text[start:end]), None
|
||
except json.JSONDecodeError:
|
||
continue
|
||
return text, "输出不是合法 JSON"
|
||
|
||
|
||
async def _repair(raw: Any, schema: dict[str, Any], errors: list[str],
|
||
ctx: NodeContext) -> tuple[str, dict[str, Any]]:
|
||
"""让模型只改格式地重写一遍。返回 (重写的文本, 这次调用的用量)。"""
|
||
async with SessionLocal() as session:
|
||
model, model_id = await get_chat_model(
|
||
session,
|
||
ModelSpec(provider=ctx.cfg("provider"), model=ctx.cfg("model"), max_tokens=4096),
|
||
)
|
||
prompt = (
|
||
"下面这段输出没有通过 JSON Schema 校验，请只调整格式后重新输出。\n\n"
|
||
"规矩：你只能搬运原始输出里已经有的值，不许补数据。原始输出里没有的值一律填 null，"
|
||
"即使 Schema 要求它不能为空——不许用 0、空字符串或任何猜测的值凑数，不许编造。"
|
||
"值要从原文里原样抄过来。\n\n"
|
||
f"Schema：\n{json.dumps(schema, ensure_ascii=False, indent=2)}\n\n"
|
||
f"错误：\n- " + "\n- ".join(errors) + "\n\n"
|
||
f"原始输出：\n{_as_text(raw)[:6000]}\n\n"
|
||
"只输出修正后的 JSON，不要任何解释或代码围栏。"
|
||
)
|
||
started = time.perf_counter()
|
||
response = await model.ainvoke(prompt)
|
||
# 修复是一次真实的模型调用，以前不发 llm.end、不进 usage，钱花了账上看不见
|
||
meta = getattr(response, "usage_metadata", None) or {}
|
||
inp, out = int(meta.get("input_tokens") or 0), int(meta.get("output_tokens") or 0)
|
||
spent = {"input_tokens": inp, "output_tokens": out, "total_tokens": inp + out,
|
||
"cost_usd": round(catalog.estimate_cost(model_id, inp, out), 6), "calls": 1}
|
||
ctx.emit(EventType.LLM_END, model=model_id, purpose="repair",
|
||
duration_ms=int((time.perf_counter() - started) * 1000), **spent)
|
||
return message_text(response), spent
|
||
|
||
|
||
def _as_text(raw: Any) -> str:
|
||
return raw if isinstance(raw, str) else json.dumps(raw, ensure_ascii=False, default=str)
|
||
|
||
|
||
# 原文里的数字：可带千分位、小数、正负号
|
||
_NUMBER = re.compile(r"-?\d[\d,]*(?:\.\d+)?")
|
||
_PERCENT = re.compile(r"(-?\d[\d,]*(?:\.\d+)?)\s*[%％]")
|
||
# 字符串值里要能在原文找到的片段：数字、拉丁词、连续的汉字
|
||
_PIECE = re.compile(r"\d+(?:\.\d+)?|[A-Za-z]+|[\u4e00-\u9fff]+")
|
||
|
||
# 数字的证据不从代码里取。「假设调用工具 + 一段 SQL」正是最常见的造假形状，而 SQL 里
|
||
# 到处是数字：WHERE status > 0、deleted = 0、LIMIT 10。认它们的话，编出来的
|
||
# total_count: 0 就有了「出处」。要去掉的是：代码围栏（sql / python / shell 之类）、
|
||
# "sql": "…" 这类字符串值、以及正文里看起来像 SQL 的那一段（SELECT … FROM … 到句末，
|
||
# 后面接着的 WHERE / LIMIT 之类的行一并算进去）
|
||
_CODE_FENCE = re.compile(
|
||
r"```[ \t]*(?:sql|mysql|postgres(?:ql)?|sqlite|plsql|python|py|bash|sh|shell|zsh"
|
||
r"|javascript|js|typescript|ts)\b.*?(?:```|$)", re.I | re.S)
|
||
_CODE_VALUE = re.compile(r'"(?:sql|query|statement|code|script|command)"\s*:\s*"(?:[^"\\]|\\.)*"',
|
||
re.I)
|
||
_SQL_RUN = re.compile(
|
||
r"\b(?:select\b|with\s+(?:recursive\s+)?\w+\s*(?:\([^)]*\))?\s+as\s*\()"
|
||
r"(?:(?!\.\s)[^；;。]){0,400}?\bfrom\b[^\n；;。，]*"
|
||
r"(?:\n[ \t]*(?:where|and|or|group|order|having|limit|offset|union|on|join|left|right|inner"
|
||
r"|outer|full|cross)\b[^\n；;。，]*)*", re.I)
|
||
|
||
|
||
def _without_code(text: str) -> str:
|
||
for pattern in (_CODE_FENCE, _CODE_VALUE, _SQL_RUN):
|
||
text = pattern.sub(" ", text)
|
||
return text
|
||
|
||
|
||
def _numbers_in(text: str) -> set[float]:
|
||
"""原文里（代码之外）所有数字的值。中文写法（十二条、3.5万）按出具回指那套规则一并认；
|
||
带百分号的另认它的小数写法（12.5% → 0.125 是格式换算，不是编造）。"""
|
||
from app.engine.issuance import extract_numbers
|
||
|
||
text = _without_code(text)
|
||
out: set[float] = {token.value for token in extract_numbers(text)}
|
||
for token in _NUMBER.findall(text):
|
||
try:
|
||
out.add(float(token.replace(",", "")))
|
||
except ValueError:
|
||
continue
|
||
for token in _PERCENT.findall(text):
|
||
try:
|
||
out.add(float(token.replace(",", "")) / 100)
|
||
except ValueError:
|
||
continue
|
||
return out
|
||
|
||
|
||
def _literals(schema: Any) -> set[str]:
|
||
"""Schema 自己规定的取值（enum / const）：把「成功」映射成 "ok" 是格式，不是编造。"""
|
||
found: set[str] = set()
|
||
if isinstance(schema, dict):
|
||
for key in ("enum", "const"):
|
||
value = schema.get(key)
|
||
for item in value if isinstance(value, list) else [value]:
|
||
if item is not None:
|
||
found.add(str(item))
|
||
for value in schema.values():
|
||
found |= _literals(value)
|
||
elif isinstance(schema, list):
|
||
for value in schema:
|
||
found |= _literals(value)
|
||
return found
|
||
|
||
|
||
def _invented(value: Any, original: Any, schema: dict[str, Any]) -> list[str]:
|
||
"""修复结果里原文没有的值，写成 "路径=值"。
|
||
|
||
数字按数值比（原文写 1,284，修出来 1284 算有）；非空字符串要么原样出现在原文里，
|
||
要么它的每个数字、拉丁词、汉字片段都能在原文里找到（2026年9月1日 → 2026-09-01
|
||
算搬运）。布尔、null 不查：null 正是「没有这个数据」的诚实写法。
|
||
"""
|
||
text = _as_text(original)
|
||
lowered = text.lower()
|
||
numbers = _numbers_in(text)
|
||
allowed = _literals(schema)
|
||
found: list[str] = []
|
||
|
||
def known_number(n: float) -> bool:
|
||
return any(abs(n - m) <= 1e-9 for m in numbers)
|
||
|
||
def walk(node: Any, path: str) -> None:
|
||
if isinstance(node, dict):
|
||
for key, item in node.items():
|
||
walk(item, f"{path}.{key}" if path else str(key))
|
||
elif isinstance(node, list):
|
||
for i, item in enumerate(node):
|
||
walk(item, f"{path}[{i}]")
|
||
elif isinstance(node, bool) or node is None:
|
||
return
|
||
elif isinstance(node, (int, float)):
|
||
if not known_number(float(node)):
|
||
found.append(f"{path or '（根）'}={node}")
|
||
elif isinstance(node, str):
|
||
s = node.strip()
|
||
if not s:
|
||
if '""' not in text:
|
||
found.append(f'{path or "（根）"}=""')
|
||
return
|
||
if s in allowed:
|
||
return
|
||
if _NUMBER.fullmatch(s):
|
||
# 写成字符串的数字照数字查："0" 不能因为 SQL 里有个 > 0 就算有出处
|
||
if not known_number(float(s.replace(",", ""))):
|
||
found.append(f"{path or '（根）'}={s[:40]}")
|
||
return
|
||
if s.lower() in lowered:
|
||
return
|
||
pieces = _PIECE.findall(s)
|
||
ok = bool(pieces) and all(
|
||
known_number(float(p)) if p[0].isdigit() else p.lower() in lowered for p in pieces
|
||
)
|
||
if not ok:
|
||
found.append(f"{path or '（根）'}={s[:40]}")
|
||
|
||
walk(value, "")
|
||
return found
|