mirror of
https://github.com/ThearchyHelios/AgentLab.git
synced 2026-11-15 20:32:04 +00:00
03c18c4d78
一、文案(前端约 1600 处,后端传到界面的约 880 处) - 术语统一:工作流层面用「运行」(继续运行、重新运行、试运行),节点和工具层面用「执行」,不再用「跑」; 总时长 / 执行时长 / 等待审批;服务端;助手;Agent;token;工作流;固定版本;模型接入;系统提示;批准 / 驳回;受管级别 - 口语改书面:取不到、没取回来、读不懂、连不上、多半、照样、兜底、揉成这类说法改成「无法 / 未能 / 失败 / 请」;去掉拟人写法 - 不再露出实现细节:界面上不写 checkpoint、同一拍、哈希(凭证处除外),不写改版历史(「以前…」「老数据」); 报错、校验、门禁、自动修复里裸写的配置键名和枚举值换成界面上的中文标签,由新的 backend/app/engine/labels.py 统一提供; 发布弹窗里结论句的选项不再是 off / require_citation - 同一件事只留一种说法:生成阶段文案、出具档位说明、画布锁定提示各合成一份 - 去掉界面上的工业场景示例(MES、ERP、「张工」「王工」)和真实产品名,换成通用示例 二、说错的提示(都有测试证明) - 数据库测连接失败时的专用提示以前从不出现(按报错文字全等比较,永远比不上):改为按错误类型判断,不再拼出重复的前缀 - 「设置 → 供应商」改指「设置 → 模型接入」;「在设置里建数据源」改指「数据」页 - 缺少 API Key、模型接入已停用的报错不再夹英文,写明去哪里填 - 两处原因说错(「这种引用在后续版本支持」「这一版还不支持」)改成真实原因 - 节点说明里不准确的说法改正:代码节点在 microVM 或系统沙箱中执行;报告撰写、口径卡的说明不再说过头 - 导出的证据 CSV 里两列同名,第三列改为「片段编号」 三、前后端对齐 - 前端按后端原文识别日志、报错的地方,新旧两种写法都认得(历史运行里存的是旧文字),逐条补了新旧原文的核对 - 后端交回模型的原指令放进单独的 for_model 字段,前端在解析响应时去掉,不会显示到界面上 四、检查 - 检查脚本里按原文匹配的断言改成新文案;改完会变成永远成立的反向断言逐条修正,并做了变异验证 - 新增 check-copy(静态扫描前端界面字符串和后端上界面的文案):再出现「跑」「后端」「多半」「令牌」、 界面上的 Copilot、裸写的配置键名、半角标点等就报错;确需保留的写进 scripts/copy-allow.json 并注明理由
220 lines
8.5 KiB
Python
220 lines
8.5 KiB
Python
"""步数用尽时,agent 要收口,而不是把半截过程交出去。
|
||
|
||
走到步数上限一定意味着最后那步**要求了工具**(不要工具的话循环早 break 了),
|
||
也就是说模型从来没拿到过"说结论"的那一轮——它只是被掐断在半路。交出去的
|
||
是它上一句中间过程的话,末尾补一句"步数不够"。
|
||
|
||
所以补上那一轮:不给工具,让它基于已经查到的收口。这里守三件事——收尾轮
|
||
真的发生了、它**发不出**工具调用、以及它没有变成每次都多烧的一次调用。
|
||
|
||
顺带补回 agent 循环的集成测试:原来那个文件在脱敏那轮被整个删掉了。
|
||
"""
|
||
|
||
from __future__ import annotations
|
||
|
||
import asyncio
|
||
|
||
import pytest
|
||
from langchain_core.messages import AIMessage
|
||
from sqlalchemy import select
|
||
|
||
from app.db.base import SessionLocal
|
||
from app.db.models import Run, RunEvent
|
||
from app.engine.runner import run_manager
|
||
|
||
#: 收尾轮该说的话。挑一句和"中间过程"截然不同的,好分辨答案到底取自哪一轮
|
||
SETTLED = "已经查到的部分:门店 8 家。其余未查到,这个数是下限。"
|
||
MIDWAY = "中间过程:还得再查一张表。"
|
||
|
||
MAX_STEPS = 3
|
||
|
||
|
||
@pytest.fixture
|
||
async def runner():
|
||
await run_manager.setup()
|
||
yield run_manager
|
||
await run_manager.shutdown()
|
||
|
||
|
||
def _graph(*, max_steps: int = MAX_STEPS) -> dict:
|
||
return {
|
||
"nodes": [
|
||
{"id": "in", "type": "input", "data": {"config": {}}},
|
||
{"id": "work", "type": "agent", "data": {"config": {
|
||
"prompt": "{{ input.question }}",
|
||
"tools": ["calculator"],
|
||
"max_steps": max_steps,
|
||
"approval": "never",
|
||
}}},
|
||
{"id": "out", "type": "output", "data": {"config": {}}},
|
||
],
|
||
"edges": [{"source": "in", "target": "work"}, {"source": "work", "target": "out"}],
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
|
||
def never_concludes(monkeypatch, *, settle_raises: bool = False) -> None:
|
||
"""绑了工具就永远再要一次工具;没绑工具才说话。
|
||
|
||
`self.tools` 是 bind_tools 之后才有的。收尾轮走的是**没绑过工具**的
|
||
base_model,所以它必然落到下面那个分支——这正是"收尾轮发不出工具调用"
|
||
那条断言的着力点:真要是绑着工具过来的,拿到的就会是 MIDWAY。
|
||
"""
|
||
from app.providers import mock_model
|
||
|
||
def _decide(self, messages):
|
||
if self.tools:
|
||
return AIMessage(
|
||
content=MIDWAY,
|
||
# 每步参数不同:同样的调用第二次不会再执行(engine/guards.py),这里要的是真把步数用完
|
||
tool_calls=[{"name": self.tools[0]["name"],
|
||
"args": {"expression": f"1+{len(messages)}"},
|
||
"id": f"call_{len(messages)}"}],
|
||
)
|
||
if settle_raises:
|
||
raise RuntimeError("收尾轮炸了")
|
||
return AIMessage(content=SETTLED)
|
||
|
||
monkeypatch.setattr(mock_model.MockChatModel, "_decide", _decide)
|
||
|
||
|
||
async def _run(graph: dict, question: str = "有几家门店"):
|
||
run = await run_manager.start(graph=graph, input_payload={"question": question})
|
||
for _ in range(200):
|
||
await asyncio.sleep(0.05)
|
||
async with SessionLocal() as session:
|
||
row = (await session.execute(select(Run).where(Run.id == run.id))).scalar_one()
|
||
if row.status in ("succeeded", "failed", "cancelled"):
|
||
break
|
||
else:
|
||
pytest.fail("运行没有在 10 秒内结束")
|
||
async with SessionLocal() as session:
|
||
events = list((await session.execute(
|
||
select(RunEvent).where(RunEvent.run_id == run.id).order_by(RunEvent.seq)
|
||
)).scalars())
|
||
return events, row
|
||
|
||
|
||
def codes(events) -> list[str]:
|
||
return [e.data.get("code") for e in events
|
||
if e.type == "log" and (e.data or {}).get("level") == "warn"]
|
||
|
||
|
||
def answer_of(row) -> str:
|
||
from app.engine import review as rv
|
||
return rv.answer_text(row.output)
|
||
|
||
|
||
# --------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
||
|
||
|
||
@pytest.mark.asyncio
|
||
async def test_step_limit_ends_with_a_conclusion_not_a_stump(runner, monkeypatch) -> None:
|
||
"""这块改动的全部意义:交出去的是结论,不是中间过程加一句抱怨。"""
|
||
never_concludes(monkeypatch)
|
||
events, row = await _run(_graph())
|
||
assert row.status == "succeeded", row.error
|
||
|
||
text = answer_of(row)
|
||
assert SETTLED in text, text
|
||
assert MIDWAY not in text, f"上一句中间过程冒充了答案:{text}"
|
||
assert "step_limit_settled" in codes(events), codes(events)
|
||
|
||
|
||
@pytest.mark.asyncio
|
||
async def test_the_settle_round_has_no_tools_bound(runner, monkeypatch) -> None:
|
||
"""收尾轮必须在**结构上**发不出工具调用,而不是靠提示词请它别调。
|
||
|
||
mock 的判据就是"有没有绑工具":真要是把绑过工具的 model 传进了收尾轮,
|
||
它会照常再要一次工具,答案里出现的就是 MIDWAY。
|
||
"""
|
||
never_concludes(monkeypatch)
|
||
events, row = await _run(_graph())
|
||
|
||
assert SETTLED in answer_of(row)
|
||
# 工具调用次数正好等于步数——收尾轮一次都没多调
|
||
assert len([e for e in events if e.type == "tool.start"]) == MAX_STEPS
|
||
|
||
|
||
@pytest.mark.asyncio
|
||
async def test_the_settle_round_costs_exactly_one_extra_call(runner, monkeypatch) -> None:
|
||
"""多花的必须是可数的一次,不是一个说不清的尾巴。"""
|
||
never_concludes(monkeypatch)
|
||
events, _ = await _run(_graph())
|
||
assert len([e for e in events if e.type == "llm.start"]) == MAX_STEPS + 1
|
||
|
||
|
||
@pytest.mark.asyncio
|
||
async def test_a_normal_agent_does_not_pay_for_a_settle_round(runner, monkeypatch) -> None:
|
||
"""反向断言:正常收口的 agent 一分钱都不该多花。
|
||
|
||
没有这条,"每次都多跑一轮"这种退化会悄无声息地通过全部其他测试。
|
||
"""
|
||
from app.providers import mock_model
|
||
|
||
monkeypatch.setattr(mock_model.MockChatModel, "_decide",
|
||
lambda self, messages: AIMessage(content="直接就有结论了。"))
|
||
events, row = await _run(_graph())
|
||
|
||
assert "直接就有结论了。" in answer_of(row)
|
||
assert len([e for e in events if e.type == "llm.start"]) == 1
|
||
assert not [c for c in codes(events) if c and c.startswith("step_limit")]
|
||
|
||
|
||
@pytest.mark.asyncio
|
||
async def test_a_failed_settle_round_falls_back_and_keeps_what_was_found(
|
||
runner, monkeypatch
|
||
) -> None:
|
||
"""收尾轮自己挂了,不能把已经查到的一起赔进去。"""
|
||
never_concludes(monkeypatch, settle_raises=True)
|
||
events, row = await _run(_graph())
|
||
assert row.status == "succeeded", row.error
|
||
|
||
text = answer_of(row)
|
||
assert "settle_failed" in codes(events), codes(events)
|
||
# 退回原来的行为:老的 step_limit(BROKEN),而不是 settled 那个
|
||
assert "step_limit" in codes(events)
|
||
assert "step_limit_settled" not in codes(events)
|
||
# 已有成果还在,末尾挂着说明
|
||
assert MIDWAY in text and "已用完" in text, text
|
||
|
||
|
||
def test_max_steps_is_clamped_by_the_hard_cap() -> None:
|
||
"""节点上写多大都过不去硬顶——否则一张图就能把预算烧穿。"""
|
||
from app.core.config import settings
|
||
|
||
assert min(200, settings.max_agent_steps) == settings.max_agent_steps
|
||
assert settings.max_agent_steps >= 25, "抬高上限不该反而把原来能配的值挡回去"
|
||
|
||
|
||
# --------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
||
# 复核层怎么看这两种收场
|
||
# --------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
||
|
||
|
||
def _warn(message: str, code: str) -> dict:
|
||
return {"type": "log", "node_id": "work",
|
||
"data": {"level": "warn", "message": message, "code": code}}
|
||
|
||
|
||
OK_OUTPUT = {"text": SETTLED}
|
||
|
||
|
||
def test_a_settled_run_is_a_gap_not_a_break() -> None:
|
||
"""收口过的答案是完整一段话,只是覆盖面不全——那是缺口不是断裂。"""
|
||
from app.engine import review as rv
|
||
|
||
signals = rv.scan([_warn("用满了 3 步,基于已查到的部分给出", "step_limit_settled")],
|
||
OK_OUTPUT)
|
||
assert [s.severity for s in signals] == [rv.DEGRADED]
|
||
# 连带效果正是想要的:不再触发自动重跑
|
||
assert not rv.should_retry(signals)
|
||
|
||
|
||
def test_a_hard_truncation_is_still_broken_and_still_retries() -> None:
|
||
"""收尾轮没能收上来,判定一点没变——这条是防止改动把老路一起改坏。"""
|
||
from app.engine import review as rv
|
||
|
||
signals = rv.scan([_warn("用满了 3 步还没给出结论", "step_limit")], OK_OUTPUT)
|
||
assert rv.worst(signals) == rv.BROKEN
|
||
assert rv.should_retry(signals)
|