mirror of
https://github.com/ThearchyHelios/AgentLab.git
synced 2026-11-15 05:01:57 +00:00
60be16a0bb
渲染(evidence._tidy):
- 上一轮只沿着去掉的字往两边找粘连:依据前后没有空白、括号、标点时没有切口,「华东 [[v:Q1.r0.销售额]][[see:Q1]]
[[v:Q1.r0.订单数]] 笔」渲染、组装都是「4,919.5212 笔」,「[[v:…]][[see:Q1]]2 月」是「4,919.52 月」,「**华东 [[v:…]]**
[[see:Q1]]2 月」组装出「华东 4,919.52 月」,verify_doc 都不报。现在每个依据(连着写的一串、只装着依据的括号都算)
两边都判(_glue 看所有不显示的字,不只看切口),会读成一串的补一个空格:这一片有去掉的字的照旧换掉头一个,没有的
插在头一个依据前面(粗体收尾的星号外面)
- 只装着依据的括号认【】、[](全角半角混用也算)、〔〕、[],和()一样连括号去掉,外面悬着的停顿标点照原规则收拾;
依据在这些括号开头、末尾紧挨着分隔标点的,同()一样收拾。核查 agent 拿到的查询结果以「【证据 Qn】」开头,模型照着
写成「【[[see:Q1]]】」,以前渲染成「【】」
- 右边是写作者紧贴着下文写的半角逗号的(「1,200([[see:Q1]]),900」去掉括号读成「1,200,900」),空格补在逗号后面
(同「212,[[see:Q1]],5」→「212, 5」)。上一轮把这一类当成可以不管的「),5」写法;和基线 58a6759 逐份比,结构化组合里
有 2481 份是上一轮去掉括号之后才并成一个数的(「增长 12([[see:Q1]]),212 笔」→「增长 12,212 笔」),现在都隔开了
- 找挨上的字时也越过删除线的两个波浪线:前端照样画出删去的数,挨着后面的数读
- 流式渲染把这几种括号、半角方括号、波浪线也攒到后面的字来了再放;半角「]」攒着时,标记收尾的「]]」和标记里末尾的
空白不算,标记整个放出去,从它后面攒起
不含依据的文档渲染结果、内容哈希逐字不变:随机 1.6 万份不含依据的文档和基线逐份比过,BEFORE 两份哈希照旧。
测试:依据两边什么都没有(数、标记、粗体、斜体、删除线、连着写的一串)、几种括号(只装着依据、全角半角混用、套着、
和别的括号连着写、开头末尾带标点、不含依据的不动)、半角逗号的用例;结构化组合加上两种括号,中间只有依据的也算;流式
渲染、随机语料加上几种括号和波浪线;审批质询、核查 agent、反方审稿、双盲复算各补一个端到端用例。15 处改动逐一去掉实现,
相关测试都变红(第 2 轮的 7 处也重跑过,照样变红)。另在测试之外:复核用的抽查脚本 6000 份 × 6 个种子只剩写作者自己
写成「212,,2」的一份;结构化组合 29.4 万份、随机含依据的 1.6 万份和基线比没有新并成的数,流式逐字、随机分块都等于整篇
渲染。
116 lines
7.1 KiB
Python
116 lines
7.1 KiB
Python
"""反方审稿的理由:依据写进括号不再断句,占位词不当理由(期 5 真实模型验收 M1)。
|
||
|
||
真实模型验收里,反方的理由「先按订单状态做全量概览核对口径([[see:Q1]]):」「复算写作者的原查询(同 SQL 同过滤条件,
|
||
[[see:Q2]])」渲染成「():」「(同 SQL 同过滤条件,)」:审稿记录(rationale 和 rationale_doc)随正式运行封存,审批卡上
|
||
照片段原文显示。
|
||
|
||
模型一律是 MockChatModel 剧本,区域、金额都是虚构的。
|
||
"""
|
||
from __future__ import annotations
|
||
|
||
from app.core import artifact_store
|
||
from tests.test_challenge_node import ( # noqa: F401 - 夹具按名字引入
|
||
NET,
|
||
REFUNDS,
|
||
Models,
|
||
Play,
|
||
engine_up,
|
||
finish,
|
||
graph,
|
||
output_of,
|
||
shop,
|
||
)
|
||
|
||
BROKEN = ("()", "(,", ",)", "()", "(,", ",)")
|
||
|
||
|
||
async def _record(monkeypatch, shop, plays) -> tuple[dict, dict]:
|
||
Models(monkeypatch, shop, plays=plays)
|
||
row = await finish(graph(shop))
|
||
assert row.status == "succeeded", row.error
|
||
out = await output_of(row.id, "chal")
|
||
return artifact_store.load(out["challenge_artifact"]), row.output["_issuance"]
|
||
|
||
|
||
async def test_see_in_brackets_does_not_break_the_rationale(monkeypatch, shop):
|
||
plays = {
|
||
"华南销售额超过华东": Play([NET], "refuted", "扣除退款后华南为 [[v:Q1.r1.净销售额]]([[see:Q1]]),"
|
||
"仍低于华东的 [[v:Q1.r0.净销售额]](同口径,[[see:Q1]])。"),
|
||
"居各区域之首": Play([REFUNDS], "weakened", "先核对退款口径([[see:Q1]]):华东含 [[v:Q1.r0.退款笔数]] 笔退款"
|
||
"([[see:Q1]],扣除后仍居首)。"),
|
||
}
|
||
record, issuance = await _record(monkeypatch, shop, plays)
|
||
first, second = record["claims"]
|
||
assert first["rationale"] == "先核对退款口径:华东含 1 笔退款(扣除后仍居首)。"
|
||
assert second["rationale"] == "扣除退款后华南为 900,仍低于华东的 1,200(同口径)。"
|
||
for claim in (first, second):
|
||
doc = claim["rationale_doc"]
|
||
assert doc["markdown"] == claim["rationale"] and doc["violations"] == []
|
||
assert not any(mark in claim["rationale"] for mark in BROKEN)
|
||
# 括号里的依据仍挂在句子上:判「被推翻」的引用到了自己的查询,照常采信、出具降档
|
||
assert second["verdict"] == "refuted" and issuance["tier"] == "degraded"
|
||
|
||
|
||
async def test_see_brackets_written_together_do_not_glue_two_numbers(monkeypatch, shop):
|
||
"""两个只装着依据的括号连着写、数字包着粗体(复核第 2 轮):去掉之后两个数不能挨成一个(「9001,200」),句末前悬着的
|
||
逗号也去掉。"""
|
||
plays = {
|
||
"华南销售额超过华东": Play([NET], "refuted", "扣除退款后华南、华东分别为 **[[v:Q1.r1.净销售额]]**([[see:Q1]])"
|
||
"([[see:Q1]])[[v:Q1.r0.净销售额]],华南仍低于华东,([[see:Q1]])([[see:Q1]])。"),
|
||
"居各区域之首": Play([REFUNDS], "stands", "华东退款 [[v:Q1.r0.退款笔数]] 笔,扣除后仍居首。[[see:Q1]]"),
|
||
}
|
||
record, _ = await _record(monkeypatch, shop, plays)
|
||
refuted = next(claim for claim in record["claims"] if claim["verdict"] == "refuted")
|
||
assert refuted["rationale"] == "扣除退款后华南、华东分别为 900 1,200,华南仍低于华东。"
|
||
assert refuted["rationale_doc"]["markdown"] == refuted["rationale"]
|
||
assert refuted["rationale_doc"]["violations"] == []
|
||
|
||
|
||
async def test_a_bare_see_between_two_numbers_and_other_brackets_do_not_break_the_rationale(monkeypatch, shop):
|
||
"""依据直接夹在两个数之间(两边什么都没有)、写进方头括号(复核第 3 轮):两个数不能挨成一个(「9001,200」),括号
|
||
不能剩下「【】」。"""
|
||
plays = {
|
||
"华南销售额超过华东": Play([NET], "refuted", "扣除退款后华南、华东分别为 [[v:Q1.r1.净销售额]][[see:Q1]]"
|
||
"[[v:Q1.r0.净销售额]],华南仍低于华东【[[see:Q1]]】。"),
|
||
"居各区域之首": Play([REFUNDS], "stands", "华东退款 [[v:Q1.r0.退款笔数]] 笔,扣除后仍居首。[[see:Q1]]"),
|
||
}
|
||
record, _ = await _record(monkeypatch, shop, plays)
|
||
refuted = next(claim for claim in record["claims"] if claim["verdict"] == "refuted")
|
||
assert refuted["rationale"] == "扣除退款后华南、华东分别为 900 1,200,华南仍低于华东。"
|
||
assert refuted["rationale_doc"]["markdown"] == refuted["rationale"]
|
||
assert refuted["rationale_doc"]["violations"] == []
|
||
|
||
|
||
async def test_a_placeholder_rationale_is_recorded_as_no_rationale(monkeypatch, shop):
|
||
"""反方交回的理由只是占位词:记录里理由为空(审批卡据此写「反方没有给出理由」),判「被推翻」的照常不予采信。"""
|
||
plays = {"华南销售额超过华东": Play([NET], "refuted", "placeholder"),
|
||
"居各区域之首": Play([REFUNDS], "stands", "placeholder")}
|
||
record, issuance = await _record(monkeypatch, shop, plays)
|
||
first, second = record["claims"]
|
||
assert (first["verdict"], first["rationale"], first["rationale_doc"]) == ("stands", "", None)
|
||
assert second["verdict"] == "inconclusive"
|
||
assert second["rationale"] == "理由没有引用到任何查询结果,反方给出的「被推翻」不予采信,记为无法判断。反方没有给出理由"
|
||
assert "placeholder" not in str(record)
|
||
assert issuance["tier"] == "formal"
|
||
|
||
|
||
async def test_a_rationale_that_shows_nothing_is_recorded_as_no_rationale(monkeypatch, shop):
|
||
"""反方的理由只写了依据:显示出来是空的。以前按原文判,理由文档照样记下——审批卡按文档画出一片空白,不说「反方没有
|
||
给出理由」;判「被推翻」的因为引用到了 Q1 被当成有出处,照常采信、出具降档。"""
|
||
plays = {"华南销售额超过华东": Play([NET], "refuted", "[[see:Q1]]"),
|
||
"居各区域之首": Play([REFUNDS], "stands", "([[see:Q1]])")}
|
||
record, issuance = await _record(monkeypatch, shop, plays)
|
||
first, second = record["claims"]
|
||
assert (first["verdict"], first["rationale"], first["rationale_doc"]) == ("stands", "", None)
|
||
assert second["verdict"] == "inconclusive" and second["rationale_doc"] is None
|
||
assert second["rationale"].endswith("反方给出的「被推翻」不予采信,记为无法判断。反方没有给出理由")
|
||
assert issuance["tier"] == "formal", "没有理由的「被推翻」不能让出具降档"
|
||
|
||
|
||
async def test_a_placeholder_with_a_see_is_still_a_placeholder(monkeypatch, shop):
|
||
plays = {"华南销售额超过华东": Play([NET], "stands", "placeholder。[[see:Q1]]"),
|
||
"居各区域之首": Play([REFUNDS], "stands", "无。")}
|
||
record, _ = await _record(monkeypatch, shop, plays)
|
||
assert [(c["rationale"], c["rationale_doc"]) for c in record["claims"]] == [("", None), ("", None)]
|
||
assert "placeholder" not in str(record)
|